Here We Go....

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has”. Margaret Mead

ASK QUESTIONS - WOFFWATCHER

WOFFWATCHER has learned through a report in an online article posted by The RC Catalyst Friday February 20, 2015, that a change of venue was requested by the WOFF defendants' attorney.

The media coverage would be the same regardless of the change of venue. Technology has balanced the field for Journalists and Bloggers, local, national and international (Brazil and Norway with particular interest), who can find their way to any spot this court action lands. In theory, prospective jurors would seemingly be less influenced by the palpable atmosphere the RC area is purported to have against WOFF. Also in theory, they would be less distracted by the local influence of the organization.

It is probably further hoped that the past media coverage would not cloud a venue that hasn't been in the spotlight and that locals wouldn't be as informed or biased, and lack thereof would therefore minimize, at best, any influence that may prevail among participants and spectators.

What's left is the palpable sense of fear that prevails among local residents who quietly express, of retaliation or threats by the church and possibly enablers, of speaking out, discussing or questioning the church and it's members on any particular issue. 

Or, the documented attempts and lengths the church and it's legal team have taken to suppress reporting of it's in house or public activities legal or otherwise, over a considerable amount of years. 

A combination of these last two practices have presented themselves as an example of WOFF members' behavior at a public gathering bringing awareness to Child Abuse in April of last year, as documented in their video.

WW analytics detected a spike in readership in December of all contents of this blog since July 2011. I fully anticipated that opposition research would perhaps ensue and therefore that a case would be made over media coverage at some point, perhaps to even request a change of venue.

The statement making it's case beginning with “excessive” and ending with “postings” is a broad and seemingly desperate plea. Here's why:

It alludes to the WOFF church as a victim. In this case, the church is not the one on trial. There are defendants who attend and participate in the church, but again, the church is not on trial. So, this point is shaky and irrelevant.

“Excessive, pervasive and insidious publicity” is an interesting thread. 

What has been reported that isn't true? By victims, by media? 

If there is anything “excessive” it's the amount of victims that have surfaced in now over a generation. The point is: can it be proved that anything reported about WOFF ISN'T true? That would be ambitious and folly to tackle.

“Insidious” adjective

1.

intended to entrap or beguile:

an insidious plan.

2.

stealthily treacherous or deceitful:

an insidious enemy.

3.

operating or proceeding in an inconspicuous or seemingly harmless way but actually with grave effect:

 ”an insidious disease”.

If there is anything “insidious” , may I point to number 3: Operating or proceeding in an inconspicuous or seemingly harmless way but actually with grave effect.

Other nouns that may apply here instead of "disease": “practices”, “operations” “plan”, “culture”.

If one thing can be gleaned from just the published victim accounts, or even accounts from ex members, it's that the practices, plans, operations, and culture can be perceived as “insidious”. Even a fair minded outsider could even come to this conclusion, given the volume of reports.

And, are these reports credible? There are so many. Just as in the case of the accusations against Bill Cosby, and over so many years. One has to wonder.

“The subject of extraordinary persecution” is a biased statement and cannot be quantified regardless of the apparent skill of the presenter of such claims.

It will be the facts and about the incident and not the WOFF church resume that will be considered. Simple as that, aside from the irony that the proceeding in question falls on All Fools Day.

Perhaps Karma DOES have a scheduling department.

So....... in further dissecting the statement:

If there is “hatred”, perhaps it can be traced to the intended and encouraged separation and estrangement of families within and outside of the church. 

If there is “hatred”, could it be because leadership members have appeared in past court proceedings wearing furs and opulent jewelry, as if quietly taunting the community and spectators? There have been reports of taunting by WOFF members taking other forms, such as in the boasting of victory in some past court cases and some members flaunting material wealth and loud boasting of influence.

If there is "hatred", could it be because the church has apparently resisted in earning the public's trust through an accreditation agency dedicated to helping Christian ministries, and instead aspire to a model of holdings the Catholic Church has acquired over centuries?

If there is “hatred”, could it be because ex members have sought financial and continuous emotional help upon having left WOFF. And, many have said they are emotionally and or permanently scarred from their experience.

If there is “hatred”, could it be because current members have no idea what infraction they may have committed due to the whim of the matriarch of the church, on a daily basis and therefore punished in some form either by humiliation (verbal or otherwise), detainment, or perhaps even physical harm, as in two well documented cases? What may exacerbate this issue is that some church members are completely exempt from this treatment either by design or by "divine influence".

IF all of these points apply, it would be understandable for these feelings in some form or another, to be expressed, and logical that it's Genesis would take on it's own subculture.

As for continual social media postings, well, people will have an opinion, share an experience, express some sort of emotional feeling, express concern for those involved, support and encourage others to stand up to an aggressor, and some who provide resources, in the form of help and support for victims and their families, as well as some of us who confront such an organization and expose any or all potentially questionable practices.

Freedom of speech is being challenged by that statement, regardless of the opinions. If there was ever a red flag about this organization's campaign to suppress opinion and perception, much less observation, it would be this.

Any new reader or spectator to this phenomenon will ask the same question: If any or all of the documented accounts about this church are true, why has it continued? Who is helping them continue it? Why do they believe they can practice this way? Why don't more people leave? Why do they deny their actions when the evidence says otherwise?

Analytics and other forms of Math, Forensic Science, The Justice System, uncorrupted Law Enforcement, Victims speaking out and DOCUMENTING EVERYTHING, Youth, Solid Journalism, Brave, Committed Individuals, and the will of Fair Minded Souls, with the guidance of God, can force this organization to either disband or assemble doctrine that does not produce or continue the results of it's current tenant. 

Indeed, it is ongoing.

-WOFFWATCHER

 PORTUGUESE VERSION FOR BRAZILIAN READERS


"Nunca duvide que um pequeno grupo de cidadãos preocupados e comprometidos pode mudar o mundo, na verdade, é a única coisa que já tem" Margaret Mead.FAÇA PERGUNTAS - WOFFWATCHERWOFFWATCHER aprendeu através de um relatório em um artigo online publicado por O RC Catalisador sexta-feira 20 de fevereiro de 2015, de que uma mudança de local foi solicitada pelo advogado dos réus WOFF.A cobertura da mídia seria a mesma independentemente da mudança de local. Tecnologia equilibrou o campo para jornalistas e blogueiros, locais, nacionais e internacionais (Brasil e Noruega, com particular interesse), que pode encontrar o caminho para qualquer ponto estas terras de ação judicial. Em teoria, jurados teria aparentemente ser menos influenciado pela atmosfera palpável área de RC é suposto ter contra WOFF. Também em teoria, seriam menos distraídos pelo influência local da organização.É, provavelmente, ainda mais a esperança de que a cobertura da mídia passado não ofusquem um local que não tem sido o centro das atenções e que os moradores não seria tão esclarecido ou tendenciosa, e falta dela, portanto, minimizar, na melhor das hipóteses, qualquer influência que possa prevalecer entre os participantes e espectadores.O que resta é a sensação palpável de medo que prevalece entre os moradores locais que, silenciosamente, expressam, de retaliação ou ameaças pela igreja e, possivelmente, capacitadores, de falar, discutir ou questionar a igreja e seus membros sobre qualquer assunto particular.Ou, a tentativas documentadas e comprimentos da igreja e é a equipe jurídica tomaram para suprimir comunicação de que é em casa ou atividades públicas legal ou de outra forma, mais de uma quantidade considerável de anos.A combinação destes dois últimos práticas têm se apresentado como um exemplo de comportamento dos membros WOFF em uma reunião pública trazer a consciência a pederastia em abril do ano passado, conforme documentado no seu vídeo.Analytics WW detectado um aumento no número de leitores em dezembro de todos os conteúdos deste blog desde julho de 2011. Eu totalmente antecipou que a pesquisa oposição talvez acontecer e, portanto, que um caso seria feito sobre a cobertura da mídia em algum momento, talvez até mesmo solicitar uma mudança de local.A declaração que faz o é caso começando com "excessiva" e terminando com "lançamentos" é um apelo amplo e aparentemente desesperado. Eis o porquê:Alude à igreja WOFF como vítima. Neste caso, a igreja não é a única a julgamento. Há réus que assistir e participar na igreja, mas, novamente, a igreja não está em julgamento. Então, esse ponto é instável e irrelevante."Excessiva, a publicidade difundida e insidiosa" é uma discussão interessante.O que tem sido relatado que não é verdadeiro? Pelas vítimas, pelos meios de comunicação?Se existe alguma coisa "excessivo" é a quantidade de vítimas que vieram à tona agora mais de uma geração. O ponto é: é possível provar que nada relatou sobre WOFF não é verdade? Isso seria ambicioso e loucura para atacar.Adjetivo "Insidious"1.destina-se a atrair ou seduzir:um plano insidioso.2.furtivamente traiçoeiro ou enganoso:um inimigo insidioso.3.operacional ou processo de uma forma imperceptível ou aparentemente inofensivo, mas, na verdade, com efeitos a sepultura:

 "Uma doença insidiosa".Se existe alguma coisa "insidiosa", eu posso apontar para o número 3: Operação ou processo de uma forma imperceptível ou aparentemente inofensivo, mas, na verdade, com efeitos a sepultura.Outros nomes que podem ser aplicados aqui em vez de "doença": "práticas", "operações" "planeja", "cultura".Se uma coisa pode ser adquirida a partir apenas das contas das vítimas publicados, ou até mesmo contas de ex membros, é que as práticas, planos, operações e cultura pode ser entendida como "insidiosa". Mesmo uma pessoa de fora justo ocupado poderia até chegar a esta conclusão, dado o volume de relatórios.E, são estes relatórios credíveis? Há tantos. Assim como no caso das acusações contra Bill Cosby, e ao longo de tantos anos. Um tem que saber."O tema da perseguição extraordinário" é uma declaração tendenciosa e não pode ser quantificado, independentemente da habilidade aparente do apresentador de tais alegações.Serão os fatos e sobre o incidente e não o currículo igreja WOFF que serão consideradas. Simples assim, além da ironia de que o processo em causa cai no Dia de Todos os tolos.Talvez Karma tem um departamento de programação.Então ....... em dissecar ainda mais a afirmação:Se há "ódio", talvez possa ser atribuída ao pretendido e incentivou separação e do afastamento das famílias, dentro e fora da igreja.Se há "ódio", que poderia ser, porque os membros de liderança têm aparecido em processos judiciais últimos vestindo peles e jóias opulento, como se calmamente insultando a comunidade e os espectadores? Houve relatos de insultos por parte de membros WOFF tomando outras formas, como na jactância da vitória, em alguns casos judiciais passadas e alguns membros ostentando riqueza material e alto jactância de influência.Se há "ódio", que poderia ser porque a igreja tem, aparentemente, resistiu em ganhar a confiança do público através de uma agência de acreditação dedicada a ajudar os ministérios cristãos, e em vez aspirar a um modelo de participação da Igreja Católica adquiriu ao longo dos séculos?Se há "ódio", que poderia ser por causa ex membros têm procurado a ajuda financeira e emocional contínuo sobre ter deixado WOFF. E, muitos disseram que estão emocionalmente e ou permanentemente cicatrizes de sua experiência.Se há "ódio", que poderia ser, porque os membros atuais não têm idéia do que eles infração pode ter cometido devido ao capricho da matriarca da igreja, em uma base diária e, portanto, punido de alguma forma, quer por humilhação (verbal ou de outra forma ), detenção, ou talvez até mesmo danos físicos, como em dois casos bem documentados? O que pode agravar este problema é que alguns membros da igreja são totalmente isentos deste tratamento seja pelo design ou pela "influência divina".Se todos estes pontos se aplicam, seria compreensível para esses sentimentos de alguma forma ou de outra, a ser expressa, e lógico que é Genesis levaria, por si própria subcultura.Quanto aos contínuos lançamentos de mídia social, bem, as pessoas vão ter uma opinião, compartilhar uma experiência, expressar algum tipo de sentimento emocional, expressa preocupação com os envolvidos, apoiar e incentivar os outros a pé até um agressor, e alguns que fornecer recursos, em a forma de ajuda e apoio às vítimas e suas famílias, bem como alguns de nós que enfrentar uma tal organização e expor qualquer ou todas as práticas potencialmente questionáveis.A liberdade de expressão está sendo desafiada por essa declaração, independentemente das opiniões. Se alguma vez houve uma bandeira vermelha sobre a campanha desta organização para suprimir a opinião e percepção, muito menos de observação, seria este.Qualquer novo leitor ou espectador para este fenômeno vai fazer a mesma pergunta: Se algum ou todos os relatos documentados sobre esta igreja são verdadeiras, por que continuou? Quem está ajudando continuar isso? Por que eles acreditam que podem praticar esta forma? Por que mais pessoas não sair? Por que eles negam suas ações quando as evidências dizem o contrário?Analytics e outras formas de Matemática, Ciência Forense, O Sistema de Justiça, não corrompida Aplicação da Lei, as vítimas falar e documentando tudo, Juventude, Jornalismo Sólidos, bravo, indivíduos comprometidos, ea vontade das Almas justo ocupado, com a orientação de Deus pode, forçar esta organização, quer dissolver ou montar doutrina que não produz ou continuar os resultados do mesmo do atual inquilino.Com efeito, está em curso.-WOFFWATCHER

SWEDISH VERSION 

Here We Go ...."Tvivla aldrig que en liten grupp av omtänksamma och engagerade medborgare kan förändra världen, ja, det är det enda som que någonsin har" Margaret Mead.ASK FRÅGOR - WOFFWATCHERWOFFWATCHER har lärt sig genom rapporten i en online artikel publicerad av The RC Catalyst fredag ​​20 februari 2015, que förändringen av plats begärdes av WOFF talades advokat.Mediabevakningen skulle vara densamma oavsett om förändringen av plats. Teknik har balanserat fältet för journalister och bloggare, lokala, nationella och internationella (Brasilien och Norge med särskilt intresse), som kan finna sin väg till någon plats här domstol landar. I teorin, blivande nämndemän skulle synes vara mindre påverkade av den påtagliga atmosfären RC området är påstods ha mot WOFF. Även i teorin, skulle de vara mindre distraherad av webbplatsen inflytande i organisationen.Det är förmodligen ytterligare Top hoppats que det senaste mediebevakningen skulle inte moln arenan que har inte varit i rampljuset och que lokalbefolkningen skulle inte det informeras eller partisk, och brist därav skulle minimera Därför i bästa fall får något inflytande que råda Bland deltagare och åskådare.Vad är kvar är påtaglig känsla av rädsla råder que Bland de lokala invånare som tyst uttrycker, för repressalier eller hot vid kyrkan och eventuellt möjliggörare, för att tala ut diskutera eller ifrågasätta kyrkan och det är medlemmar på någon särskild fråga.Eller, de dokumenterade försöken längder och kyrkan och det är coolt team har vidtagit för att undertrycka rapportering av det interna eller offentliga aktiviteter Legal eller annars under ansenlig mängd år.Kombinationen av dessa två sista metoder har själva Presenterade ett exempel på WOFF medlemmars agerande vid en offentlig sammankomst föra medvetenhet till barnmisshandel i april förra året, den dokumenterade i deras video.WW analytics upptäcktes piggen i läsekretsen i december allt innehåll i denna blogg sedan juli 2011. Jag helt väntad que oppositions forskning skulle uppstå och kanske gör därför que ärendet skulle ske över mediebevakningen någon gång, kanske gör att ens begära en ändring av mötesplats.Uttalandet gör det fallet börjar med "överdriven" och slutar med "inlägg" är en bred och till synes desperata vädjan. Här är varför:Det anspelar på WOFF kyrkan som ett offer. I det här fallet, är kyrkan inte den på rättegången. Det finns svarande som närvara och delta i kyrkan, men återigen, är kyrkan inte på rättegång. Så, är detta skakig och irrelevant."Överdriven, genomgripande och smygande publicitet" är en intressant tråd.Vad har rapporterats att det inte är sant? Genom offer, av media?Om det är något "överdriven" det är mängden offer que har dykt i generation nu över. Poängen är: kan det bevisas que Redovisat något om WOFF är inte sant? Det skulle vara ambitiös och dårskap att tackla."Insidious" adjektiv1.Avsedd att snärja eller bedra:en smygande plan.2.smyg förrädiska eller bedräglig:en smygande fiende.3.Rörelse eller ett förfarande i en undanskymd eller till synes harmlösa sätt men faktiskt med svår effekt:
 "En lömsk sjukdom".Om det är något "smygande", kan jag peka på nummer 3: Rörelse eller ett förfarande i en undanskymd eller till synes harmlösa sätt men faktiskt med allvarlig effekt.Andra substantiv que kan gälla här i stället för "sjukdom", "praxis", "verksamhet", "planerar", "kultur".Om en sak kan utläsa från bara offret publicerade konton, eller till och med konton från tidigare medlemmar, det är att den praxis, planer, verksamhet och kultur kan uppfattas som "smygande". Även mässan sinnade outsider Kunde till och med kommit till denna slutsats, Med tanke på omfattningen av rapporter.Och, är dessa rapporter trovärdiga? Det finns så många. Precis som i fallet med anklagelserna mot Bill Cosby, och under så många år. Man måste undra."Ämnet extra förföljelse" är en partisk uttalande och kan inte kvantifieras oavsett den uppenbara skicklighet presentatör av sådana påståenden.Det kommer att vara de faktiska omständigheterna och om händelsen och inte WOFF kyrkan sammanfattar que kommer att beaktas. Enkelt som que, bortsett från det ironiska que förfarandet i fråga faller på All Fools Day.Kanske Karma har en schemaläggning avdelning.Så ....... ytterligare Top dissekera uttalandet:Om det finns "hat" Kanske kan spåras till den avsedda och uppmuntrade separation och förfrämligande av familjer i och utanför kyrkan.Om det finns "hat" Kan det vara ledarskapet eftersom medlemmarna har Fanns med i tidigare domstolsförhandlingar bär pälsar och överdådiga smycken, om tyst smädar samhället och åskådare? Det har förekommit rapporter om pika av WOFF medlemmar tar andra former, såsom i skryter om segern i några tidigare rättsfall och några medlemmar nonchalera rikedom grejer och högljudd skryter om inflytande.Om det finns "hat" Kan det vara eftersom kyrkan har motstått Tydligen i tjäna allmänhetens förtroende genom ett ackrediteringsorgan dedikerade att hjälpa kristna departement, och istället sträva efter en modell av att hålla den katolska kyrkan har förvärvat under århundraden?Om det finns "hat" Kan det vara eftersom tidigare medlemmar har sökt ekonomiskt och känslomässig hjälp på att ha kontinuerlig vänster WOFF. Och många har sagt att de är känslomässigt och eller permanent ärrad från Deras erfarenhet.Om det finns "hat" Kan det vara eftersom de nuvarande medlemmarna har ingen aning om vad överträdelse De kan ha begått på grund av infall av matriark av kyrkan, på daglig basis och därför straffas i någon form Antingen genom förnedring (verbalt eller annars ), internering, eller till och med kanske Gör fysisk skada, som i två väl dokumenterade fall? Vad kan förvärra denna fråga är que vissa församlingsmedlemmar är helt undantagna från denna behandling Antingen genom konstruktion eller genom "gudomligt inflytande".Om alla dessa punkter gäller, skulle det vara förståeligt för dessa känslor i en eller annan form, för att vara expresso och logiskt att det är Genesis skulle ta på egen subkultur.Genomsnittet för sociala Ständiga inlägg, ja, människor kommer att ha en åsikt, dela en upplevelse, uttrycka någon form av känslomässig känsla, uttrycker oro för de inblandade, stödja och uppmuntra andra att stå upp mot en angripare, och några som Tillhandahålla resurser, i form av hjälp och stöd för offren och deras familjer, samt några av oss som konfronterar en sådan organisation och exponera någon eller alla Potentiellt tvivelaktiga metoder.Yttrandefrihet utmanas av que uttalande, oavsett yttranden. Om det någonsin var en röd flagga om denna organisations kampanj för att undertrycka åsikt och uppfattning, mycket mindre observation, det skulle vara så här.Varje ny läsare eller åskådare till detta fenomen kommer ställa samma fråga: Om någon eller alla av de dokumenterade konton om denna kyrka är sant, varför har det fortsatt? Vem hjälper dem hålla det? Varför tror de tror de kan öva på detta sätt? Varför inte fler människor lämnar? Varför de gör sitt agerande förnekar När bevisen säger annars?Analytics och andra former av matematik, kriminalteknik, rättsväsendet, oskadat brottsbekämpning, offer talar ut och dokumentera allt, ungdom, Solid journalistik, Modig, Engagerade individer, och viljan av Fair Minded Souls, med ledning av Gud, kan tvinga denna organisation att upplösa Antingen eller montera läran que inte producerar eller behålla resultatet av det nuvarande hyresgäst.Det är faktiskt pågår.-WOFFWATCHER

NORWEGIAN VERSION

"Aldri i tvil om at en liten gruppe av gjennomtenkte, engasjerte borgere kan forandre verden, ja, det er det eneste som noensinne har" Margaret Mead.Still spørsmål - WOFFWATCHERWOFFWATCHER har lært gjennom en rapport i en online artikkel postet av RC Catalyst fredag ​​20 februar 2015, at en endring av arena ble forespurt av WOFF saksøktes advokat.Mediedekningen vil være den samme uavhengig av endring av sted. Teknologi har balansert feltet for journalister og bloggere, lokale, nasjonale og internasjonale (Brasil og Norge med spesiell interesse), som kan finne veien til et sted denne retten handling lander. I teorien potensielle jurymedlemmene ville tilsynelatende være mindre påvirket av følbar atmosfæren RC området er påstått å ha mot WOFF. Også i teorien, ville de bli mindre distrahert av den lokale innflytelse i organisasjonen.Det er sannsynligvis ytterligere håpet at det siste mediedekningen ikke ville sky en arena som ikke har vært i søkelyset, og at lokalbefolkningen ville ikke være så informert eller partisk, og mangelen på dem ville derfor minimere, i beste fall, noen innflytelse som kan råde blant deltakere og tilskuere.Det som er igjen er det opplagt følelse av frykt som råder blant lokale innbyggere som stille uttrykke, for represalier eller trusler ved kirken og muligens hjelpemidlene, for å snakke ut, diskutere eller stille spørsmål ved kirken og det er medlemmer på en bestemt sak.Eller, den dokumenterte forsøk og lengder kirken, og det er juridiske team har tatt for å undertrykke rapportering av det er i huset eller offentlig virksomhet lovlig eller ikke, over en betydelig mengde år.En kombinasjon av disse to siste praksis har presentert seg selv som et eksempel på WOFF medlemmenes atferd på en offentlig sammenkomst bringe oppmerksomhet til Child Abuse i april i fjor, som dokumentert i sin video.WW analytics oppdaget en topp i lesertall i desember alt innhold i denne bloggen siden juli 2011. Jeg er helt forventet at opposisjonen forskning ville kanskje passes på og derfor at en sak vil bli gjort over mediedekningen på et tidspunkt, kanskje til og med be om en endring av arena.Uttalelsen gjør det er tilfelle begynner med "overdreven" og slutter med "innlegg" er en bred og tilsynelatende desperat bønn. Her er hvorfor:Det henspiller på WOFF kirken som et offer. I dette tilfellet, er kirken ikke den på rettssaken. Det er tiltalte som møte og delta i kirken, men igjen, er kirken ikke tiltalt. Så, er dette punktet skjelven og irrelevant."Overdreven, gjennomgripende og snikende publisitet" er en interessant tråd.Det som har blitt rapportert som ikke er sant? Av ofrene, etter media?Hvis det er noe "overdreven" det er mengden av ofrene som har dukket opp i nå over en generasjon. Poenget er: det kan bevises at noe rapportert om WOFF er ikke sant? Det ville være ambisiøs og dårskap å takle."Insidious" adjektiv1.ment å fange eller snik:en lumsk plan.2.stjålent forrædersk eller svikefull:en lumsk fiende.3.drifts- eller prosesser i et lite synlig eller tilsynelatende harmløs måte, men faktisk med alvorlig effekt:

 "En snikende sykdom".Hvis det er noe "skummelt", kan jeg peke på nummer 3: Drifts eller prosesser i et lite synlig eller tilsynelatende harmløs måte, men faktisk med alvorlig effekt.Andre substantiver som kan gjelde her i stedet for "sykdom": "praksis", "drift" "plan", "kultur".Hvis en ting kan leses ut fra bare de publiserte offeret kontoer, eller til kontoer fra ex medlemmer, er det at den praksis, planer, drift og kultur kan bli oppfattet som "snikende". Selv en rettferdig tenkende outsider kan selv komme til denne konklusjonen, gitt volumet av rapporter.Og, er disse rapportene troverdig? Det er så mange. Akkurat som i tilfellet med anklagene mot Bill Cosby, og over så mange år. Man må lure på."Faget ekstraordinære forfølgelse" er en tendensiøs fremstilling og kan ikke kvantifiseres uavhengig av den tilsynelatende dyktighet av programleder av slike krav.Det vil være fakta og om hendelsen og ikke den WOFF kirke CV som vil bli vurdert. Så enkelt er det, bortsett fra det ironiske at rettssaken i spørsmålet faller på All Fools Day.Kanskje Karma har en planlegging avdeling.Så ....... i ytterligere dissekere uttalelsen:Hvis det er "hat", kanskje det kan spores tilbake til den tiltenkte og oppmuntret separasjon og fremmedgjøring av familier i og utenfor kirken.Hvis det er "hat", kan det være fordi lederskap medlemmer har dukket opp i siste søksmål iført pels og overdådige smykker, som om stille spotter samfunnet og tilskuere? Det har vært rapporter om spotter av WOFF medlemmer som tar andre former, for eksempel i den skryte av seier i noen tidligere rettssaker og noen medlemmer flaun materiell rikdom og høyt skryt av innflytelse.Hvis det er "hat", kan det være fordi kirken har tilsynelatende motstand i å tjene publikums tillit gjennom et akkrediteringsorgan dedikert til å hjelpe kristne departementer, og i stedet håpe på en modell av beholdningen den katolske kirke har ervervet gjennom århundrer?Hvis det er "hat", kan det være fordi ex medlemmer har søkt økonomisk og kontinuerlig emosjonell hjelp ved å ha forlatt WOFF. Og mange har sagt at de er følelsesmessig og eller permanent arr fra sine erfaringer.Hvis det er "hat", kan det være fordi nåværende medlemmer har ingen anelse om hva infraction de kan ha begått på grunn av innfall av matriark av kirken, på en daglig basis, og derfor straffet i en eller annen form, enten ved ydmykelse (verbal eller på annen måte ), tilbakeholdelse, eller kanskje til og med fysisk skade, som i to godt dokumenterte tilfeller? Hva kan forverre dette problemet er at enkelte kirkemedlemmer er helt unntatt fra denne behandlingen enten ved design eller av "guddommelig innflytelse".Hvis alle disse punktene gjelder, ville det være forståelig for disse følelsene i en eller annen form, for å komme til uttrykk, og logisk at det er Genesis ville ta på sin egen subkultur.Som for kontinuerlige sosiale medier innlegg, vel, vil folk ha en mening, dele en opplevelse, uttrykke en slags emosjonell følelse, uttrykker bekymring for de involverte, støtte og oppmuntre andre til å stå opp til en angriper, og noen som gir ressurser, i form av hjelp og støtte for ofrene og deres familier, samt noen av oss som konfrontere en slik organisasjon og avsløre noen eller alle potensielt tvilsom praksis.Ytringsfrihet blir utfordret av den uttalelsen, uavhengig av meninger. Hvis det noen gang var et rødt flagg om denne organisasjonens kampanje for å undertrykke mening og oppfatning, mye mindre observasjon, ville det være dette.Enhver ny leser eller tilskuer til dette fenomenet vil stille det samme spørsmålet: Hvis noen eller alle av de dokumenterte beretningene om denne kirken er sant, hvorfor har det fortsatt? Hvem er å hjelpe dem til å fortsette det? Hvorfor gjør de tror de kan øve på denne måten? Hvorfor la ikke flere folk? Hvorfor nekte de gjør sine handlinger når bevisene sier noe annet?Analytics og andre former for matematikk, Forensic Science, rettsvesenet, uncorrupted Law Enforcement, Ofre snakke ut og dokumenterer alt, Ungdom, Solid journalistikk, modig, engasjerte individer, og viljen til Fair Minded Souls, med veiledning av Gud, kan tvinge denne organisasjonen til enten oppløse eller montere doktrine som ikke produserer eller fortsette resultatene av den nåværende leietaker.Faktisk er det pågående.

-WOFFWATCHER 

VICTIMS IN THE SPOTLIGHT, NOW MORE POWERFUL THAN EVER Lessons Are Right In Front of You

Our critics are our friends because they DO show us our faults. - Ben Franklin

The number of people identifying themselves as victims against the alleged acts of Bill Cosby continues to grow despite any formal action toward charging him for criminal or civil actions. But hints of this to change keep coming. Spare for a few sprinkled comments Cosby has made about these allegations, albeit rather sparingly and without much substance, otherwise what dialogue does exist connecting victims to Mr. Cosby have been through statements made by lawyers through the media.

So far, none of any of the victims have gained any ground, exception made for settlements and dismissal by civil means or law enforcement.

So many victims, one guy, lawyers, silence. What is one to do with these elements?

Add the tragic loss of young men at the hands of law enforcement is the outrage of the moment across the country. You can decide if the legal results of these incidents prove satisfactory, or not. I only wish to use this in the context that, in this case, another form of victim is the focus of many feeling heartbreak, disappointment and rage. The entire country and certainly many parts of the globe, have expressed their outrage and ancillary feelings in some form or another. Some have been violent. Most have not.

A seeming pandemic of “victims”, regardless of the cause, is a result cultural and technological evolution, not to forget, voyeuristic nature of humans hunger to read all the gory details and further to express their heartbreak, outrage and intent to correct wrongs done them.

But there have always been victims. Those victims however, were not to benefit of the volume of attention we have most recently assigned their contemporary ancestors.

Cosby and the victims are examples of a perfect storm and inspiration as well as opportunity for victims seeking justice against WOFF.

Interest and activism toward the cause of helping victims has never been so palpable among those in and around the WOFF culture, members, ex-members, family members, observers and we who seek to hold them accountable.

Whereas Mr. Cosby is potentially more financially able to fend off potential plaintiffs, and Law Enforcement and Municipalities settle with victims' families, WOFF does not appear to claim that luxury due to the generations of people affected both in and out of the organization. The potential number of litigants here is staggering.

Read that paragraph again.

Whereas Mr. Cosby is potentially more financially able to fend off potential plaintiffs, and Law Enforcement and Municipalities settle with victims' families, WOFF does not appear to claim that luxury due to the generations of people affected both in and out of the organization. The potential number of litigants here is staggering.

Any action from the next victim or victims will require courage, support, counseling, time, research, financial support, activism, media and justice to affect an outcome.

                                                        Where Is This Sign Now?

The victim shouldn't have to do any of the heavy lifting. They are already victims.

Indifference, however, threatens success for these victims. I see it all over Facebook, except for less than handful of people, where readers are interested in reading and commenting about WOFF and victims, but stop short of activism, if not changing their profile photo and absurd political views.

Indifference has been observed in the form of those who read this blog and do absolutely nothing, yet they keep coming back for the latest scoop or commentary.

Readers of this ilk serve no purpose if they are spectators. They don't realize they can make a difference by making a call to a lawyer or a cop in their community and ask about what they could do in a situation like the one so chronicled as this.

Those are just examples. My links pages have informed many who research all things WOFF seeking to know more and to do more. Thank You for getting involved.

So, folks, what's it going to be? For three and a half years I have provided insight, resource material and commentary, at times peppered with vitriol and a pinch of levity. What can you do with this information?

All of the suggestions involving Federal Agencies are the direct result of understanding the goings on in the past AND present with day to day WOFF life. Someone who has experienced or suspected in having their mail or phone conversations monitored, have a link for that.

There are links for bankruptcy, medical, legal, civil, criminal, etc. published on previous WW blogs. Google them!

Perhaps you know of a victim. How can you help?

You have cameras on your phones, you know how to use the internet, you can read, you can think,, you can make phone calls, you know people, you know people who know people.....

And so on.

I have asked readers to get off of their minimally exercised surpluses before and I am saying it now.

DO SOMETHING.

VICTIMS: you have been through the worst. Now it's your turn to seek justice. Enough of us care about you to see it through with you.

Let's help these people

-WOFFWATCHER

How Some People Think The Way They Do - A Repost and It's Worth Reading....

“Is everyone who lives in Ignorance like you?" asked Milo.
"Much worse," he said longingly. "But I don't live here. I'm from a place very far away called Context.” ― Norton Juster, The Phantom Tollbooth

Many of us like to believe that our opinions have been formed over time by careful, rational consideration of facts and ideas, and that the decisions based on those opinions, therefore, have the ring of soundness and intelligence.

In the real world, we often base our opinions on our beliefs, which can have an uneasy relationship with facts. And rather than facts driving beliefs, our beliefs can dictate the facts we chose to accept. They can cause us to twist facts so they fit better with our preconceived notions. Worst of all, they can lead us to uncritically accept bad information just because it reinforces our beliefs. This reinforcement makes us more confident we’re right, and even less likely to listen to any new information. This effect is only heightened by the information glut, which offers — alongside an unprecedented amount of good information — endless rumors, misinformation, and questionable variations on the truth.

In other words, it’s never been easier for people to be wrong, and at the same time feel more certain that they’re right. The “I know I’m right” syndrome, is a potentially formidable problem in a democratic system. It suggests not only that most people will resist correcting their factual beliefs, but also that the very people who most need to correct them will be least likely to do so. Analysts have termed this as “motivated reasoning.”

Whether or not the consistent information is accurate, we might accept it as fact, as confirmation of our beliefs. This makes us more confident in said beliefs, and even less likely to entertain facts that contradict them.

JANE AND WOFF LEADERSHIP fit into this context, among others.

This is a repost from 2011.

-WOFFWATCHER

You Want Controversy? Gender Bias?

Though much is taken, much abides; and though
We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.  -Alfred Lord Tennyson

One can't help but notice how much the women of WOFF, be they in leadership or in the family of WOFFers, maintain rule.

I know this because I(WW), have personally witnessed where the woman is clearly in charge and the husband is clearly submissive in WOFF culture. Specifically, they seem to have a much more cutting, if not vicious way of control in their charge which more often than not, extends itself to family members outside of the cult.

It is indeed a key, notable, if not, stark, dynamic that keeps this dangerous cult, thriving. WW believes this is one of the secrets behind their success, such as it is.

Despite whatever WOFF dynamics may prevail, my/your tenacity, persistence and vigilance will ultimately decide WORD OF FAITH FELLOWSHIP's (Spindale, NC) change in direction, much less, termination as a force. (stop  here and read the bold statement)

Let's go over this again, because many of you forget, get confused, etc.....

WW hasn't any problem with worshiping GOD. WW compels you to challenge WOFF's way of controlling people, amassing such a large financial war chest, making people work for the "church" all the time without pay, monitoring it's members when they go out of town with chaperones or reporting to membership/leadership by phone, assigning a member to go with another member's Doctor's appointments, punishing and lying to members who want to leave (still don't know of any ex-woff members having drug overdoses and turning to prostitution....), arranging marriages, approving when married members have sex ( is that redundant?) and encouraging estrangement from family members NOT in WOFF.

 Again, this must end. 

 

(continue)

Since many agree that this is a more effective way to keep continuity, at least where control is concerned, it has one weakness that can't be avoided.

I say this because it takes one to know one. (Here's where WW's gender comes into question)

Simply, if the women of WOFF are not taken seriously, or if someone is dismissive about their authority, this takes them over the edge much more so than a guy who doesn't get his way.

Would it surprise you to learn that WOFF membership men outnumber women WOFFWATCH readers 10-1?

If WOFF guys, many, if not most, are terribly unhappy with their situation, but not saying anything about it to keep every one together or until one gets the nerve, would collectively just say no and take the reins, this would certainly be a good start to bringing this evil empire down.

Every man has experienced dealing with a manipulative or assertive woman. WW has witnessed though, when dismissed, the woman goes nuts. It doesn't take very much. And there goes the control out the window.

This may put the man on the potential “battered husband” category. But many in WOFF membership may already be there. If you are, report it to the police. Be responsible.

Mutiny? Of course! But, it's only a start.

Hence planning!

Many come to this blog out of curiosity only to spend about 30 minutes to an hour going over the links pages (most read blog withing WW) and letter to Jane (number 2 most read) and steps to take in reporting potential crimes or violations.

Reading and thinking about it is one thing. Acting on it with a report or phone call to one of the agencies listed, is another.

All this while staying safe, being lawful and responsible, is a tough balance.

I can tell you that the WOFF women membership reading this (the ones that report everything back, and by the way, thanks for making “lets report to leadership what we heard...” one of the top five read blogs since WW's inaugural tome) will really make some noise about today's blog. This will be your proof that dismissive, works!

Now, if one or two of you can just make it to the interview with Justice or Homeland Security or IRS...AND NOT CHICKEN OUT!

REMEMBER: WOFFWATCHER DOES NOT CONDONE, SUGGEST, APPROVE OF, ENDORSE PHYSICAL ACTS OF AGGRESSION OR VIOLENCE OR ANY ACT THAT IS CONSIDERED UNLAWFUL OR ILLEGAL TOWARD WOFF AND OR IT'S REPRESENTATIVES. ANY ACTS COMMITTED TO A PERSON, BE THEY IN WOFF OR OUTSIDE THE ORGANIZATION SHOULD BE REPORTED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT IMMEDIATELY, OR IN THE CASE OF VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS, ETC. SHOULD BE REPORTED TO THE APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENT OR SOCIAL AGENCY.

MAINTAIN YOUR RIGHTS AS A VICTIM AND DON'T BECOME A PERPETRATOR.

-WOFFWATCHER

Attack? Victims? A Product of Manipulation, Get off your A.......

I do respect people's faith, but I don't respect their manipulation of that faith in order to create fear and control.  -  Javier Bardem

The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words.  -  Philip K. Dick

The only difference between a cult and a religion is the amount of real estate they own. - Frank Zappa

The greater the power, the more dangerous the abuse  - Edmund Burke

Usually, one quote will do as a precursor to each discussion. This one however, compels WW to pile on with several potent quotes.

Many of you know someone, a mother, mother in law, father, father in law, boss, brother, sister, and ex wife, an ex husband, daughter, son, friend, acquaintance, and yes, pastor....who gets their way, has a way with words, possibly some charisma, and perhaps has developed a reputation, for being persuasive.

These people might not always see themselves as manipulative, but keen observers always do. I have known many people who pride themselves over having so much influence over people.

And then there are some who are so delusional, they don't believe they are doing harm with their words or influence.

Their arsenal is stacked with tactics, such as playing the victim, as detailed in this very good web page .

It is this gift, skill, talent or power, with variations and nuances incorporated into a system that Jane Whaley controls over her followers and church.

WOFF sees itself as being persecuted for their beliefs. So, Jane has developed a system to counter “persecution” by likening themselves to the Jewish people who suffered at the hands of Hitler and the Nazis.

However, I don't know of any WOFF members who are or have been in concentration camps, put to death, tattooed for identification, experimented upon, made to work as slaves, etc. at the hands of others.

Do you?

So, Jane, WOFF MEMBERS ARE NOT LIKE THE JEWISH PEOPLE. You have nothing in common with them. To put yourselves among them, under the guise of honoring their plight with exhibits, education and conferences, is pure theater, more importantly an insult to the Jewish People.

You are not fooling anyone except the members who live by your every word.

As with being a victim, is as one who has class. One who possesses it should never proclaim it. Rather, let the observers make that call. This distances you, certainly distinguishes you from those, who claim to be victims/have class.

Attacks, as used by WOFF members to describe people's opinions or feelings toward them are the preferred spin, viewpoint from what it actually is: CHALLENGE.

Challenging is not attack.

The bombing of Pearl Harbor by the Japanese Empire was an attack because it employed the use of weapons, hence, an attack.

Disagreement over a topic with the use of facts to support it, is a challenge.

The issue here has always been about control is so important to Jane, which must stop, and will stop.

The issue has always been about the types of punishment and lies Jane doles out to people, which is unnecessary and may result in law enforcement intervention.

The issue here has always been about why a "church" refuses to be transparent in it's financial matters.

The issue here has always been about the "church" and it's "legal team" firewall and gaming the system to it's advantage.

The issue here is why a church that professes love for all and feels persecuted, always winds up making headlines for: being accused of assault, being accused of hate crimes, being accused of stealing people's children, being accused of having "church members" stalk other members or former members or other people, among other accusations.

Sign Posted in front of WOFF during the Lowry Case. It was taken down shortly after the trial was dropped. How convenient!

Federal and local Investigation is necessary to prove to the world what I already know about Jane, WOFF and it's "legal team".

WOFF, you aren't fooling anyone out here. And from the chatter I am hearing, some of your members question your credibility.

The true victims here are those who have chosen to BELIEVE Jane Whaley's words and live by them.

The true victims here are those families who have been estranged/cut off from family members inside WOFF.

The true victims here are those in Brazil, Norway and other countries who are recruited to join the “church” and ultimately separated from family members and their homes to be with the congregation in North Carolina.

The true victims are people inside the church and made to work for the church (free labor), who are required to give money to the church beyond their means, who are punished needlessly at the whim of Jane's wrath.

Those who read this blog and just sit and sigh and do nothing are NOT VICTIMS.

I have stated time and time again and plainly: GET UP OFF YOUR A?!$ AND DO SOMETHING.

Have I not painstakingly assembled an outline of ideas with links to agencies for reporting possible violations of civil rights, hate crimes, hipaa acts, assaults, etc? See the links in previous blogs.

I have my own list of work to accomplish toward seeing to it that WOFF and Jane are held accountable to the law with regard to finances, civil rights, hipaa, and possible crimes.  I have made significant progress toward that end.

There is nothing NICE about this kind of fight with WOFF.

WOFF has a financial war chest and legal team. Both will be challenged beyond their limits very soon.

There is no polite way of getting you motivated. I do not care if you do not care about how I go about this. Either you are in, or you are not. I have no tolerance for spectators. We need responsible individuals who will go by the legal system to affect this issue.

Every bit of evidence helps. Yours might be the one that blows this thing wide open. So, it can't all be from my efforts, you have to contribute.

This means, for some people, individuals with the B@!!$ to take their individual matters to authorities and not giving up at the first opportunity, and IN A LAWFUL AND RESPONSIBLE MANNER.

And, if you are trying to avoid drama, or don't want any drama, don't even get in the fight. You don't belong in any army.

WOFF members may view this as an expression of frustration WW blog readers. No, just some of you. But the work continues.

Further, some in WOFF, especially Jane, view WW as just a blogger.

You both are very wrong.

Who stands with me to make a difference?


-Woffwatcher

Research, Intelligence, What's next?

"...And God so loved the World....."

-The Bible

After recently observing the WW site internally, WW has seen that regular readers come to this site daily for the latest rant, lesson, news, etc. No updates have been posted since April 23rd, but some of you have explored earlier posts, in addition to the highly viewed links and Letter to Jane. Good for you. I had hoped these and other posts would get the attention they deserve as many who have followed this blog only have gone to the Links and Letter and skipped the other good ones.

Following behind those top two are: Let's report to Leadership, And if you listen very hard, Document Everything, It's That Time of Year Again.......and Never Underestimate...

WW felt that although posts hit the nail on the hammer each time, many of you don't quite have the motivation to: leave WOFF, blow the whistle on enablers, and certainly comment or even email me about anything WOFF.

I understand your frustration. I understand your fear.

There is no need to fear. If you want to email in confidence, I guarantee your anonymity.

I can say I know this now because I have been in your neighborhood.

And while I have silently gleaned the intel, most of it is really confirming WOFF chatter I have intercepted before, only a couple of things stood out. But they are big.

I love grits, by the way. Everything fried? Bring it on! Incredible food and super nice people, mostly in Ca'aline-ah. And what is the deal with all the rain? And what is the deal with NC SC drivers?

Oh, now everybody with a surveillance camera is stumbling over the tapes to check for any “stranger”!   Go ahead, I dare anybody to identify me.

One more thing: Was that God bringing those storms and continuous rain or was it God not happy with the middleman/woman, again?

News?

Michael Lowry is out, physically, from WOFF.

Ok, so what about the charges against WOFF?? I know your plate is full right now, guy. Work on getting back on your feet. We're rooting for you!

John Huddle's blog reported that some students at a local college were having a time with WOFFers.

A custody battle is up front again.  (Thank You John Huddle!)

WOFF weddings are so numerous now, the Moonies are taking notice.

There has always been WOFF interest in foreigners and going to foreign countries, but lately it's wholesale Brazil, and Northern Europe from where the big draws are emanating.

I'm pretty sure most everyone who follows WW or Religious Cults info knows all of this.

What WW found wasn't so much news, it was confirmation.

Confirmation that people are really divided in the region. I say region because the WOFF controversy extends beyond Rutherford County. This really was an eye opener. I can safely say that WOFF is a household name at least in a 150 mile radius of Rutherford County, easy.

Cities like Atlanta, Tulsa, suburban Miami, Orlando, Tampa, Greenville SC, Charlotte, Raleigh, Nashville, Name a city in Virginia, have WOFF ties, enablers, family members, members, or just people that have an opinion of it.

What's impressive here is that people have an opinion, not just know, about WOFF.

Most people who have an opinion have heard of Jane, think WOFF is a cult, know someone who knows someone that was/is in it, think there's more to it than just a religion..

WOW!                                                       

And so it is for just about every person asked in Rutherford and surrounding counties. Only one difference in the immediate area, though. They are angry about WOFF's presence as well as Jane and some of their members. Many did not know that everyday business people and movers and shakers are responsible for helping it be what it is today. The one's that do, are afraid to speak.

Local government has some good people in it, others.....? You've been made. I know who you are and I have seen your faces and where you live and how you live. I am talking about the WOFF enablers. Some of them live in other parts of the USA and some in-state.

Some of the agencies WW has asked you to contact through the many previous links provided, if you have information, or believe a crime was committed,  that might lead to an investigation, already have WOFF under it's microscope.

Most telling is thenumber of scrutinous eyes on the legal teams involved with the higher than average number of bankruptcies of WOFF members.

WOFF legal teams know they and WOFF are being watched, but don't know the entire list.

Some WOFF enablers know they are being watched.

As for the WOFF members?

I found many of them to be absolutely lovely people. It's quite apparent that they have made a choice for themselves and this church suits them fine, warts and all.

I am dismayed however at the treatment of some of the WOFF members by outside people, who, as it seems to me or any broad minded person, are seemingly pleasant and sincere, but take a figurative beating by people who hate WOFF or don't understand or don't want to understand.

Their confusion or ignorance about WOFF is understandable.

WOFF members not in leadership have made a choice. Like some people make a choice to smoke, to live any way they like to. And, so because they worship God diferently justifies outsider's actions against regular WOFF members, how?????

Grant it, some of the regular WOFFers I have observed may be involved in the practices to which we object, and we can never know the full scope, but leadership is mostly, if not, entirely responsible for controversial actions. No one can excuse that Jane Whaley is the one that says she is the ONLY ONE who talks to God. That any other way of worshiping God is not good enough to reach heaven.

Ma'am, I talk to God too. WW readers have talked to God. We have ALL talked to God.

And he talks to US too.

God's grace brings you to God, but many times the middleman/woman is the wrench in the works.And that's where people get confused, hurt, taken advantage of, lied to, punished for no reason other than to defy HER.

Adults, children, human beings don't deserve this kind of treatment - all in the name of God. Not by this woman, not by this church, not by it's leadership, not by anyone.

There are WOFF members are not comfortable with their existence in this organization. They are the ones who deserve our attention and compassion. It is THEY who feel trapped and report punishment  (i.e. the fourth building) or the threat of humiliation or that they will be hooked on drugs or that they'll die of cancer or that no one will ever talk to them again or they will be cut off from the family they leave behind.

Remember, NO is the most powerful weapon you have against treatment you feel is getting out of hand.

NO stops everything.

NO gets results.

NO gets you out of there.

There are the outside family members who have been estranged by Jane's edict, who deserve our attention and compassion.

These two groups are reason enough for this blog. But so have some of WOFF's practices.

WW has made peace with the fact that people make choices every day. Some who made a choice to join WOFF and are clearly happy, to their own satisfaction. You've got to give them that.

God bless them.

I am sure if they had a different leader or doctrine, they would be just as happy, but wouldn't have to account for their every action to the church or leader.

We must continue to think clearly and responsibly and act accordingly to help those seeking to leave WOFF and to comfort families inside and out torn by WOFF.

We can't, you can't, do anything harmful. Leave your emotions in check. It's hard, but YOU CAN do it.

If you meet another WOFFer who isn't in leadership, leave them alone. Your fight is to HELP those seeking refuge and your fight is to help those families. Those people love GOD. It may be different from how you do, so respect that.

This mission continues. It has however, gone to another level now.

Here's what WW knows:

Mistakes will cost WOFF. This will be their undoing. Government agencies already looking will pounce at the first solid opportunity.

WOFF leadership and it's attorney's are wary of confrontation and the unknown.The legal teams, such as they are, are overconfident and blinded by their zeal. They have been helped along by individuals within the local justice system. And they too, have been made.

A great example of this is the mug shot pictures of the WOFF security team, upon arrest, for complaint of stalking Michael Lowry and Jerry Cooper, the individuals were smiling. Local mug shots for anyone else in this process won't allow for SMILING.

WOFF is more unprepared than they are prepared for the next or big legal fight.

They have enemies in local government that haven't quite all made themselves known.

Their fight with the state Department of Social Services may seem dormant, and for the most part, it seems. However, WOFF stands to lose ground with them in the future.

WOFF enablers will continue their relationship because most seem to feel insulated from any connection or relationship. The key word here is seem. That's all I can say right now.

I ask that followers of this blog think sensibly and not fall prey to the drama created by past examples of drama that have sunk past cases with Police and the Courts.

Think of consequences. Let WOFF make mistakes in front of you while you are video taping any encounter. Look at You Tube videos of people in situations. Cameras don't lie. There is a You Tube video in WOFF's future. Most importantly, don't give in to emotions. Plan ahead. Remember details, names of witnesses, times, locations. Look at a Police incident report and see what details they will need when you DO file a report. Ask God to help you keep your senses when the going get's tough.

Finally, to make my point, Jane and WOFF are down on “the world”. It's in God's own Bible that "he loved the world”.

Worshiping God is not an exclusive club. It is between you and he. It doesn't have to be someone's church or statue or person saying they are speaking on behalf of God. Can't you talk to God? You can. He listens. He answers prayers. He sometimes doesn't answer prayers. He has a plan for you. Listen to GOD, not his self appointed representative.

So, here's WW problem with WOFF:

WOFF's treatment of people who just don't want to be there by punishing them and humiliating them and even lying to them ("If you leave, you'll get hooked on drugs"), is reprehensible. 

WOFF's system of living with families to keep "walking with God" but more to listen in on phone calls, go through mail, computers, contact with outside family members, is reprehensible.

Further, opening recruitment campaign  to countries with open tolerance (sometimes viewed as less sophisticated or jaded) to marry WOFF members, is reprehensible.

Jane Whaley's personal involvement in directing couples to join, court, have sex, have children, is reprehensible.

Also, Jane's assertion that THEY/WOFFers, are the only way to heaven, is reprehensible.

WOFF's war chest, that is, bank accounts and considerable assets with sometimes vague ties to the church and or Jane, which defy accountability, are reprehensible.

Jane's edict to cut off ties with family members outside their church, is reprehensible. This affects many people and generations to come.

Jane's manipulation of some people, including doleing out punishment, humiliation, or even telling people "they are like my own family", is reprehensible.

WOFF's cozying up to Holocaust Victims to reinforce their own credibility as being victims themselves, is reprehensible.

RELIGIONS, instead of YOUR own connection with God, have succeeded in creating victims.

The Catholic Church has it's tragedy involving young boys and priests.

FLDS and it's practices of  arrangement of illegal marriages between his adult male followers and underage girls.

Anders Behring Breivik  hurt 151 people and killed 77. Hours prior to the events, Breivik released a 1,500 page manifesto detailing that immigrants were undermining Norway's traditional Christian values, and identifying himself as a "Christian crusader". Analyses of his motivations have noted that he did not only display Christian terrorist inclinations, but also had non-religious, right-wing beliefs.

Muslims being confused for extremist muslims.

Klan members justify their actions based on Christian beliefs.

The mass suicide of The People's Temple in 1978 in Jonestown, Guyana.

Televangelists who live in luxury at the expense of their followers.

And many American Christians believe they are victims because they are connected with being conservative. Now that's custom victimization at it's most blatent example.

The common thread: VICTIMS.

How is WOFF different from these? 

How far do you want to carry this, people?

Read the bible. Help someone that needs help. Feed and or clothe someone hungry. Join a group that helps people. Give. Pray. Visit a nursing home or a hospital. Good is good. Stay focused. Visit not one church, but many others. WW has been to many. It's real interesting how people worship. The more culture you expose yourself to, the less you will be apt to judge others, but more importantly, you will learn. You may even learn to embrace new thinking or people or theology. Avoid churches that are just social opportunities.

This should be a connection with YOU and GOD. Everything else doesn't really matter.

-WOFFWATCHER